Mica Notch Mine

Other Names: Virgin Mountain chrysoberyl Mine , Mica Notch deposits and Leavitt claims

Commodities: mica and beryllium

Location: Township 15 S, Range 71 East, Section 17,18

History: Earliest work was done for mica in about 1900; some beryllium ore was produced in 1935.

Geology: Muscovite mica occurs in pegmatite dikes associated with chrysoberyl, beryle, garnet, magnetite, and tourmaline. The dikes cut Precambrian garnet-mica schist; gneiss foliation trends northeast and dips southeast. The mica occurs in books up to several inches thick and g to 8 inches square. Specks of foreign material are present and it is not cleavable in large sheets.

I found the picture below in a mining journal in the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology. I tried to take the next picture from the same spot but I should have gone down the road a little farther. However you can see the change over the years:

This is what remains of the old mining shack of the Mica Notch Mine. You can can still see some of the old shingles from the roof:

My son and I looking over the remnants of the Mica Notch Mine in Nevada's backcountry:

Some of this information came from Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Report 45. Mineral Resources of the Overton 30' x 60' Quadrangle: http://www.nbmg.unr.edu/dox/r45.pdf

View Larger Map

Swath of Country

While working on my Bachelors of Science my major was in the field of Geography. Within my coursework in Geography we explored the theory behind Landscape. I was fresh off the farm when we first started talking about Landscape so I thought the definition was pretty cut and dry. My understanding was that landscape was the swath of country that lay before you. It didn’t take long for me to realize that my professors were talking about something entirely different.

The concept behind landscape is an academic abyss of scientific theory enveloped within an indefensible appeal to the human senses. My crude grasp of landscape as simply being the swath of land before me was replaced by something much less concrete. Landscape embodies the sights, the sounds, the smells, the history and the spirit of the given place. It’s not just what I see but also the perceptions that I have about the place. It’s all of the individual characteristics, physical and cultural, coming together to make that place unique.  The idea of landscape can get pretty fuzzy and is no doubt open to interpretation.  This connection or identity can be personal or it can be shared with a community of people who have the same values. One physical location is often defined by many interpretations of what makes up a landscape.

I find it worrisome that the Bureau of Land Management has chosen to run headlong into the theory of landscape as a tool to manage public lands. Our land managers do not exactly a good record when it comes to managing our cultural antiquities. The wrongful implementation or management of the landscape theory can inflict irreparable damage by losing key components of the cultural landscape. This management tool also enlarges the vulnerability in being susceptible to political pressure to modify those aspects of the landscape that aren’t compatible with the current political climate.  As a result one group’s view of what the landscape is gets imposed upon everyone else who henceforth experiences that landscape. True interpretation of landscape isn’t distorted to serve one specific perception of the area but rather to truly encompass the whole history of the area.

Implementing the BLM’s National Landscape Conservation System, Senator Reid and Congressman Horsford have introduced a bill in each respective House of Congress to designate the Gold Butte region an NCA with large quantities of wilderness. The NCA is a designation within the National Landscape Conservation System. This real life scenario regarding Gold Butte provides a perfect example of this process being manipulated by outside factors to fabricate a landscape to fit within one group’s view of an area and employing their political influences to modify the landscape to fit their needs.

The cultural landscape of Gold Butte does not reflect a landscape that has been untouched by human existence as the current proposal depicts. Rather the rich cultural tones of the landscape are highlighted with the human struggle to survive and adapt within the setting they inhabit. The cultural features found on this landscape such as rock art, arastras, mines, corrals, barbwire and roads enrich the cultural account of this beautiful and complex landscape.  The theory of Wilderness contrasted against the historical account of humans and their interaction with the landscape of Gold Butte makes the claims by those seeking this designation laughable for anyone who knows the history of the area.

I am not opposed managing our public lands through the theory of landscape; however I am opposed when this concept is used to retool a landscape to fit a political agenda. We need to focus our energy on documenting the full historical account of this landscape and expend less energy on second rate labels and categories to box these areas within. I hate to see the current path the Interior is taking in managing our lands because we will again lose generations of history and culture as their labels and bureaucracy erase what made this country strong. 

Bigger Fires to Put Out

Southern Nevada is currently experiencing the largest wildfire currently burning in the lower 48. As I have watched the smoke pour off Mount Charleston and inundate the Las Vegas Valley for the last couple of days, I cannot help but think of the damage this fire is causing on one of the Vegas Valley’s favorite outdoor recreation areas. Painted against the backdrop of this tangible threat is the fabricated threat which comes in the form of a public lands bill currently lingering in both Houses of Congress. This disgraceful yet no less dangerous hazard threatens yet another one of Southern Nevada’s outdoor recreation areas.

Over the years, as I have been involved in some of the discussions regarding public lands management, the threats to public lands have been a big topic. As I think over the individual threats, there is one event that imposes all of these threats at one time, and that is a wildfire.  It is my opinion that wildfires are the biggest threat to our public lands joined by the management practices that create the conditions for these catastrophic events.

In 2012 alone 9.3 million acres were burned by wildfires. The total acres of the Forks, Tramp, Virgin Gold, Bunkerville and Nickel fires totaled over 125,000 acres within the Gold Butte ACEC.  Wildfires are a legitimate threat to Gold Butte area.  Some of the threats and the impacts imposed by wildfires that I can think of include: Erosion, Habitat Loss, Loss of Wildlife, Pollution, Invasive Species, and Loss or Damage to Cultural Sites.

It is time that our politicians and lands managers cut through the smoke and take notice that there are bigger fires to put out than the ridiculous conjured political threats surrounding public lands management. It is the very public lands management tactics of, hands off management, that are working to be imposed on places like Gold Butte that contribute to the conditions that tempt these wildfires to start.

As I listen to the reports, one of the biggest difficulties given in fighting this fire is the inaccessible terrain. As the debate rages on concerning access and roads on public lands, one important idea to keep in the forefront of the conversation is the importance of these roads when it comes to battling wildfires. Roads act as both firebreaks and as a means of accessing the fires when they do break out.

Instead of sitting around debating which label might attract more visitors or the possibility that a star on the map acts as an economic engine or any of the other nonsense that continues to fill the halls of congress, I encourage our politicians to tell the special interest lobby to focus their energies somewhere other than Gold Butte and Nevada because we have bigger fires to put out. I encourage our elected officials, at the local, state and national level, to focus their energies on working with our public lands management agencies to develop local, state and national efforts to combat the conditions that lead to, and the effects of, wildfires on our public lands. We need management policies that deal with the wildfire threats, not encourage them.

Still Are, Still Do and Working Away

The last couple of months have been brimming with the politics of Gold Butte. In May 2013 Senator Reid introduced a bill, the same ol’ bill that we have been seeing and hearing about for about the last ten plus years, into the Senate to designate Gold Butte as an NCA with loads of Wilderness. Then shortly thereafter Congressman Horsford introduced his version in the House. There has been a lot of good coverage about the details and meetings that have been going on over the last couple of months in both the Moapa Valley Progress and the Mesquite Citizens Journal.

I have spent a lot of time visiting with our County Commissioner going over the maps and proposals trying to come up with a cocktail of a compromise for a bill that could appease the differences of opinion on the best practices on public lands management. I have spent a lot of time trying to come up with, for myself, the things that I want out of our public lands. As I have tried to boil it all down for myself I believe the truth of the matter to be that the management practice of Wilderness and fancy designations from a Washington bureaucrat does nothing in reality for our public lands. My thoughts have been expressed over the years in different articles that I have written:

On wilderness: Wilderness as a Trophy

Designations as a Management Tool: Learning the Hard Way

Access: Defining Access

Management Practices: Creating a Responsible Environment

Threats to Public Lands: What Do You See

Limiting our Lands: Misconception of Public Pressure

As I have read over these articles my thoughts are still the same. Designations and unscientifically proven management practices should not be implemented on our public lands. Wilderness as defined by Congress in 1964 is an idealistic piece of poetry not public lands management:

“A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his own works dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.”

For now, those who visit our public lands known as Gold Butte still are. Those who enjoy four wheeling responsibly, still do. Those who enjoy peaceful solitude in the back country still find it at Gold Butte. And those who make their living proselytizing bureaucracy in the form of wilderness are still working away.

Meanwhile the raging chronicle continues in regards to the politics that have consumed Gold Butte like a wildfire. As long as proposals and numbers on wilderness acres come before legitimate conversations on the actual issues that face our public lands there will always be contention.  

Let us hope that like those bills that have come before, this latest rendition will also go by the wayside.